Disputes Relating to Negotiable Instrument Act
- Home
- Disputes Relating to Negotiable Instrument Act
Cheques and negotiable instruments form the backbone of commercial transactions and credit systems. Dishonour of cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act carries both civil and criminal consequences. Our practice handles both prosecution and defense of cheque bounce matters.
We represent both cheque holders seeking recovery and issuers defending against dishonor charges. We understand the technical requirements of Section 138, including notice requirements and proof standards, and litigate strategically through civil and criminal forums.
Our Services Include
Our Expertise
We navigate the intersection of civil recovery and criminal liability in cheque bounce cases, managing diverse debtor-creditor relationships and pursuing recovery through multiple forums.
Under Section 138, dishonor can result in imprisonment up to 2 years, fine up to 2x cheque amount, or both. Prosecution requires proof of the cheque holder’s notice to the drawer within 30 days of dishonor.
The notice must be issued within 30 days of dishonor, specify the cheque particulars, demand amount, and timeline for deposit/payment (typically 15 days), and be served by registered post or personal service.
Section 147 allows compromise of offences before the court frames charges. After charge is framed, compromise is not permitted. Settlement should occur before criminal prosecution proceeds.
Besides criminal prosecution, cheque holders can sue for civil recovery of the cheque amount and damages. Civil suits for dishonored cheques are typically decided faster than regular commercial litigation.
Defenses include insufficient funds not being the reason for dishonor (alternate reasons accepted by banks), procedural defects in notice/service, cheque delivered without authorization, or that amount was a gift/loan not a liability.
INQUIRY FORM